from the mind of critic-11/23/16

From the mind of critic: “If rules are meant to be broken, what’s the point of having them in the first place? Are they simply guidlines that attempt to rain in bad behavior, that allow people to go right to the line of illegal acts, and even a little past them, because people will always break the law, but atleast they’re stopped from going to far? Or are they meant to stop bad behavior all together, but because rule makers are all human and have their price, they have built a back door into the rules that alolows those with vast financial capabilities to break all the rules they want and never go to jail, while those with no financial capabilities have no way to pay off rule makers and end up languishing in jail, allowing those financially able individuals to buy off those lawmakers in the first place? Without rules, chaos becomes a much bigger possibility. Fairness is something that must bleed through the whole system, or we can make all the laws and rules we want, but they won’t mean a damn thing if they only apply to some people, and not to others. When our politicians play fast and loose with the truth, it’s no wonder that when recieving the power they paid off a lot of people to get, they so openly flout the rules that were meant to not only stop them, but to stop them from accepting payoffs from others to gain influence, which is how they got their position in the first place. Let’s get one thing straight, when the president does something illegal, it is still illegal. And when the president has a conflict of interest, it is still a conflict of interest. Are we gonna sit back and allow a fascist to tear up everything that’s good about America, or are we gonna stand up and do something about it” 🙂